Mark Zuckerberg tried Vision Pro: his reaction won’t surprise you, but for the wrong reasons

Mark Zuckerberg he tried apple Vision Pro. So far there wouldn’t be anything strange, in fact it’s normal for the head of a company to try rivals’ products, but Zuck didn’t stop there, and thought it best to share his opinion with the world via a reel on Instagram, and who are we not to comment on it?

The CEO of Meta gets straight to the point, immediately stating that Meta Quest 3 is not only better in terms of quality/price ratio, but is actually better than Vision Pro from every point of view. In particular Zuckberberg underlined the following points:

• The passthrough of Quest 3 is of high quality (it is almost unanimous opinion that passthrough is one of the greatest strengths of Vision Pro – Ed.)
• Quest 3 is designed for play (even with the others), Vision Pro no.
• Quest is much more comfortable with its 120 grams less and there are no wires in the middle
• The field of view it’s wider and the screen is brighter (according to Zuckerberg)
• Vision Pro has motion blur when you move, Quest does not (this is intentional because Vision Pro focuses more precisely on the exact point where its user’s eyes are looking, thanks to its eye tracking functions, mimicking in a certain sense the normal functioning of sight – Ed.).
• There greater resolution of Vision Pro “costs too much” in terms of design, ergonomics, etc.
• Quest 3 has both the hand trackingmore accurate than Vision Pro, than controllers, great for gaming
• The eye tracking of Vision Pro is very accurate, and will return in the future also on Quest (spoiler!)
• There content library Quest’s immersive experience is much broader
• There are apps YouTube And Xbox For this

In short, to get back to where we started, the Quest is so much better in most cases that there’s really no competition.

And although it is clear that the innkeeper will always tell you that his wine is better, Zuckerberg has valid arguments to his bow, because Vision Pro has not introduced almost nothing really new.

But why don’t people know this? Why was Meta able to sell itself poorly? Maybe maybe yes, because in any case Apple has ensured that many people try Vision Pro al day onetherefore creating content about him and with him, while for the launch of Quest 3 there was not even a remotely comparable media campaign.

And pay attention: in the many videos and articles that have flocked about Vision Pro, almost no one compares it to Quest 3 because almost no one has it (unless they bought it by their own will); and it’s a shame (for Zuckerberg) because probably in this way his “review” it would sound much less biased.